Iowa Supreme Court plurality holds that under the state constitution, the right to counsel does not attach in the context of a request for a private phone call to an attorney after implied consent has been invoked requesting a breath specimen/chemical test, and Iowa Code section 804.20, which allows a phone call to an attorney to be monitored, but an in-person private meeting with an attorney, does not violate the right to counsel under the Iowa Constitution Article I, section 10. Actually, three justices so held, three dissented and disagreed with the decision, and one justice concurring with the result believed that even if the right to counsel attached, it was not violated by the monitored phone call.

Read the case here